Even if these diverging opinions and mentalities do not necessarily have to result in open clashes within the couple, they can cause women to feel bewildered and get caught in dilemmas. “Is it acceptable to sleep with a guy I like, although I have no intention of getting married to him?”, “Shall I tell him that I want him to satisfy me orally?”, “Should I buy myself this sex toy?” are the kinds of questions that ladies may ask themselves. In the past, the answer would have been quite simple: “No”. Nowadays, it is all the more important to communicate as a means to understand oneself and one another. Candidness can help resolve the confusion many people are confronted with. This blog is here to enlighten perplexed readers, and to guide them on their path to determine what is right and what is wrong – for them. In the end, lust, love and lechery are personal matters, and everybody should ascertain and decide for themselves what they want.
As many of us may have learned from John Gray’s popular book series, men and women come from two planets far far away. They are different in many sexual aspects, including their desires, impulses, motivations, fantasies, responses, preferences, behaviours, etc. In order to get a better understanding of each other, it can be useful to compare these facets and to realise what these polarities are and where they come from. Sometimes, it will seem that there is no real distinction in their urges and orientations and that both genders want the same thing after all. While a certain convergence may be observed, it is rather unlikely that the process is going to continue forever. Sexual selection is the result of an intra-sex struggle (or a game). As males always need to fight harder in order to reproduce, they grow increasingly stronger, more beautiful or smarter, while the manoeuvres and tricks they employ to gain access to females also get more and more vicious. The latter then adapt to these unfamiliar methods by evolving novel devices and mechanisms meant to counter them (and vice versa, i.e., males adapting to females’ developments). With all these changes taking place in the last 50 years, it is quite probable to see men and women displaying more dissimilar lust patterns again in the future.
Meanwhile, this blog attempts to sensitise the public to these fundamental contrasts and to examine the reasons for their existence. This should help readers acknowledge them, raise attentiveness, and avoid misunderstandings. I sincerely believe that those who are perceptive, cognisant, considerate, and tolerant enough of these gender differences can make better choices, thus enjoying better as well as longer and more successful relationships. It is my hope that this blog will have such an influence on people, especially on those who are open-minded enough to embrace the ideas presented here.
As Jared Diamond writes in the preface of his work Why Is Sex Fun?:
“The subject of sex preoccupies us. It’s the source of our most intense pleasures. Often it’s also the cause of misery, much of which arises from built-in conflicts between the evolved roles of women and men.”
The present publication is based on the same premise, and also seeks to provide answers. Luckily enough, proverbs turn out to come in extremely handy in this endeavour. One will be surprised how much insights about men, women, sex, desire, passion, temptation, promiscuity, etc. these locutions contain in particular. Thanks to these maxims, the nature of intimate relationships suddenly becomes graspable. As we are about to discover, the most incomprehensible thing about sexuality is that it is comprehensible. This alone should be good news for most of us.
Notice, however, that the purpose of the blog is to clarify who we are (men and women), what we want, and why that is so. With some rare exceptions, it does not show how to solve problems. In other words, reading this blog will neither introduce any sex tricks nor explain how to seduce men, turn on women, spice up foreplay, deal with adultery, etc. What it may have an impact on is how both sexes differ and on why human beings are behaving or reacting the way they do. At this, the discussion covers various forms of information that could be interesting or futile, ranging from known knowns (“women like sex”) through known unknowns (the exact time of the “first time”) to unknown unknowns (“what does a woman want”). At any rate, it is up to each reader to determine how to act on this knowledge in order to attain his or her objectives.
Critics may argue that the content is nothing more than new wine in old wineskins. Admittedly, such an objection is not incorrect. Nothing in this blog has been invented. On the contrary, most of the ideas were adopted or quoted from existing publications, including research studies, academic papers, relationship guidebooks, magazine or website stories, Wikipedia articles, etc. Consequently, no claim is made that the present work is scientific in nature, despite the numerous citations and references. The footnotes and quotes are there for further reference only, not to prove the theoretical rightness of my statements or arguments. The notions conveyed here are merely models explaining how men and women feel and react sexually when exposed to certain triggers or impulses. Although they seem to be amazingly accurate for the people I spoke to during my research, it does not imply that they are universally applicable. The discourse is meant to trigger reflection, and should not be interpreted as practical advice like the ones you would find in a relationship guidebook.
Another point of criticism may reside in the fact that the text neglects Chinese cultural aspects. Based on the title, one would expect more historical or etymological facts as well as anecdotes about each proverb. Although such background stories would undoubtedly add some flavour to the discussion, they would also divert the reader’s attention away from the main theme of the blog – which is the relationship between men and women, not Chinese culture. The thirty-six proverbs are not the object of the investigation itself, but simply constitute the vehicle to make some key notions more apprehensible. This is the reason I consciously refrained from developing into too much detail the primary meaning of the proverbs and from recounting their origins. While such details would be interesting to many readers, I chose to offer a rather pragmatic than a historical treatment of the subject. Furthermore, after many years in the country, I tend to think that, in general, it is much more important to learn from the Chinese than about the Chinese. The blog serves precisely that former purpose.
Nevertheless, I hope that Chinese readers will forgive how I sometimes treat their beloved proverbs. A few distortions are intentional, while others are rather due to my misinterpretation of them. I apologise in advance for any offence or discomfort this may cause. Likewise, as many of the explanations and justifications I provide are based on Western ideas (most of the sources quoted were originally published in English by Western authors), the whole work must appear somewhat Euro- or Americentric. Given the title, a sinocentric approach would have been more logical or meaningful, but it finally proved impracticable, mainly because of the lack of literature about the principal subject. That being said, I trust that non-Westerners will find the Book of Sexes equally interesting and relevant for themselves and their partners, irrespective of their country of origin.
The same apology shall be expressed to whomever (representative of any of the sexes) will feel displeased about the blog’s style. Some passages may indeed raise outrage, for example when the topic of sex is handled in a rather open or crude way. Moreover, readers may be annoyed by my biased views, which more often than not favour sexual openness, fornication and pre-marital promiscuity. Admittedly, such behaviour can be considered as a betrayal of traditional ideals and may lead to the destruction of family values. At the same time, I demonstrate that sex and sexual freedom carry countless benefits, for instance in terms of improved health, physical and mental well-being, reproductive fitness, and so on.
People may also deplore that the work was tainted with sexist overtones or is plainly phallogocentric, that is, privileging “the masculine (phallus) in the construction of meaning.” If so, I wish to clarify that it is definitely not my intention to discriminate or insult anyone. Rather, my objective is to make the text interesting, pertinent, entertaining and accessible to as many men and women as possible, even if it requires including petty statements or cheap humour. By the way, I am not sure how much bearing the text can have for homosexuals, but I wish to straightforwardly disclose that it would make me divinely proud to know that some gays or lesbians are following this blog. Although I did not write it with the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community in mind, I hope that some of the insights will be applicable in the context of homoeroticism as well. I believe in questioning and flamingly encouraging everyone to be curious about the “last great minority”. From the point of view of sexual selection, it is my absolute conviction that homosexuality is actually beneficial for straight individuals, specifically by attenuating competition in the mating game. Taken in this light, the only thing we should not queer are queers themselves.
 For example, Gray (1993), Gray (1995), Gray (2009), Gray (2012)
 Diamond (1998), p. ix
 In this context, eurocentrism shall be defined as “a worldview centered on Western civilisation” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocentrism) and americentrism as “the idea or perceived bias to judge other cultures and nations by American standards” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americentrism).